De-neoliberalism

Prejudice is not allowed, the Japanese economy is finally, I am trying to escape from the last for 15 years deflationary recession. Deflation and is an ongoing price declines, the lack of demand for that cause supply capacity, ie, thought and thing that is obvious and if Mitsuhashi economic cram school private school student is a so-called "deflation cap" It has. And, it had resulted in a deflation cap, also that it's "bubble collapse" that occurred in the early 1990s, should private - school student serving those who know. In addition, when the collapse of the bubble say why bring deflation, since the bubble period are rising asset prices, even I bought a real estate and stock in debt, it is profitable I if sold after the price went up, and because the thing that bubble one is burst, the rest is only debt when, everyone is investment and consumption slowdown is supposed to push forward the repayment of the debt, ie demand is now shortage, is why prices begin to decline . This also, but it should have obvious and if the private school student, surely still people who think that "the Bank of Japan that does not increase the money supply is bad!" Is, I'm not anymore ,,, and Continue to review. After the collapse of the bubble economy, in the state in which the private sector balance sheet is worse, in order to support the gross domestic product (GDP), the government has the money to "smoking, and borrowed, use" of it quick, and "correct" It is a solution for. In other words, to compensate the demand are missing in the "bold fiscal stimulus", it is only the government that the strike deflation measures that adjust the interest rate in the "flexible monetary easing" as necessary. Deflationary gap filled if so, prices began to rise, it is that we should move away from deflation, there would have carved in mind if private - school student, the neoclassical smell theory that it can be deflation in the only monetary easing I have no reason to be deceived. If there are such fundamental things you do not know still private - school student It slack is in, we have no way to say only with loose del Fleming. http://www.mitsuhashitakaaki.net/2013/12/01/ After the Japanese government is the collapse of the bubble economy, first I, but I had to support the economy with fiscal stimulus, Hashimoto's administration had to line converted to consumption tax hike and fiscal austerity in 1997. In other words, even though the private sector has been a shortage still demand for which has not been finished yet debt repayment, is not even the government had cut the demand. As a result, the Japanese economy from 1998 we have entered a full-fledged deflationary recession. And at the same time continue the reduction of subsequent Koizumi government spending regime well as the GDP, such as public works, was rolled spear through "deregulation" to expand the deflationary gap. Ridiculous is the story Given, but the Japanese government is "You is not been O~tsu defeated spear!" That actually no such ridiculous from the second half of the 1990s really "Ninen you doing anything to me?!" And "Are you trying to kill?!" And , and I want cry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_GrSvEmQIw (Please see from around 17:30) In other words, the Japanese government has implemented a "neo-liberal" policies. Neoliberalism prices continues to drop because not work at all in deflation, reduce the wages at a faster than that pace, construction companies, etc. is bankruptcy, shaved the supply capacity of the Japanese economy, the Japanese people have become increasingly poor, Japan It is a translation was becoming like a "developing country". Current administration also said that implementing monetary easing and fiscal stimulus, neoliberalism to have been affected politicians and bureaucrats and scholars and managers profusely large voice, economic policy of the government "regulatory reform" and that it might be the gone to the wrong direction, such as "globalization", you should have to worry about if Mitsuhashi economic cram school private school student. that the Japanese economy must be getting rid of neoliberalism if to escape from deflation is needless to say, oddly enough, there are guys to criticize the neo-liberal criticism. Of course, it is the expected be criticized neo-liberal criticism from dyed-in-the-wool neo-liberal person. This controversy mean that followed from long ago, it is not surprising. And recently in even larger too shock due to the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the But neo-liberal who has become difficult to excuse, is still stubborn, they ,,, Anyway, the people who criticize the new liberal criticism, with There are those who criticize in too pale in logic would make you laugh. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCjrbv56Qws The above video gag of point means that, "Milton Friedman is the father of neo-liberal"> "Milton Friedman has denied the monetary policy and fiscal policy"> "In other words, the neo-liberal, monetary policy and is to deny the fiscal policy ">" Prime Minister Abe is to promote monetary and fiscal policy ">" Therefore, Prime Minister Abe is not a neo-liberal ">" to learn from Friedman, refused to monetary easing Only the original Bank of Japan Governor Shirakawa that continued to's new liberal ">" Therefore, it is neoliberalism's the Prime Minister Abe, who's a Chinese spy to criticize the ", I feel that. Is that the logic that's mess, but I think that it is evident considering anyone, in short, "A is B", "A is C", "therefore, B is C" of the structure it becomes, it is logically wrong. When you say in the specific example, "John is an American," "John liked the bun," "Thus, Americans are bun like" it will become to that. No, this is a kind of magic, it is assumed that there is a high possibility that it ends up as it swallow it if fans commentators of the moving image. That aside, the term "neo-liberal" has been commonly used in the next, such as the meaning. In other words, the new liberalism, "" What free market is, and the most efficient allocation of resources, under the belief that it is the best means to increase the economic welfare ", to eliminate as much as possible intervention in the market by the government, as much as possible the freedom of economic activity It is ideology to that it should be permitted. In order to realize the ideal, the new liberals, "small government", "balanced budget (sound financial)," "deregulation," "liberalization," "privatization" further claims the policy such as "globalization". "(Takashi Nakano, what wonder whether the" maintenance ", p.13) The above definition is the meaning of the new liberalism that says people who have the new liberal criticism, How can not say until the "to and from taking a Nobel Prize" If you want to criticize the criticism, at least criticized on the basis of that definition, we want without changing the arbitrarily defined using bad magic tricks. Anyway, with the neo-liberal policies "and even if watered problem is liver!", But I some private school students say, It is the street. If you do not thoroughly crushed the fundamental ideology of neo-liberalism, this zombie is to revive again even after forever. As shown in the above definition of Nakano teacher, the underlying of neoliberalism is the idea of ​​"market fundamentalism", you are not "small government" specific policy is recommended on the basis of it. Therefore, to fight against neo-liberalism, the market fundamentalism that is the liver, ie, I it comes to counter the idea that "go well if anything Makasere in the market." That said, to be awkward, but you'll have a "pure" market fundamentalist, I make money is by utilizing the ideology for the purpose of "hypocrite" Some. http://ameblo.jp/takaakimitsuhashi/entry-11751024635.html It would not be less effective probably be discussed in much reason to hypocrite. In any case, "appropriate" for "intervention" to the government of the market it is necessary to achieve the "Keiseisaimin", so it is not a "communist" and "socialist". Even put "Comintern is ~!" And label it will be irrelevant. The move away from deflation, to enrich the lives of people, to strengthen the security of the state, (not the relaxation) bold fiscal stimulus and "tighter regulations" by the government is the essential.